Dem toez
Dem toez
Same
Not surprising. Usually they’ll source forgings from different people. A lot of companies do that. The forging doesn’t matter too much, it all falls onto to manufacturer to machine the forging to spec. I’ve seen good forging stamps on shitty ass uppers or vice-versa. It’s cool to have a solid manufacturer finishing a nice stamped forging though. I definitely prefer that.My upper has M under half a diamond. More than one supplier?
Ridiculous lol
Size 15Dem toez
What's the constitution?Someone tell me if I'm totally off base, but I think that this is unconstitutional. His reference to using it retroactively sounds like an Ex Post Facto Law which is explicitly called out in the Constitution in Section 9. Am I on base here or crazy. I'm no lawyer but my infringement senses are tingling.
View attachment 90074
View attachment 90075
@triplestack3 is our only legal advice around hereSomeone tell me if I'm totally off base, but I think that this is unconstitutional. His reference to using it retroactively sounds like an Ex Post Facto Law which is explicitly called out in the Constitution in Section 9. Am I on base here or crazy. I'm no lawyer but my infringement senses are tingling.
View attachment 90074
View attachment 90075
What's the constitution?
Seriously it's fun y how everyone suddenly worried about the constitution when it's for shit like this but look the other way for civil forfeiture
Not directed at you per se but in general
@Rabbit2047 you need to get in contact with a writer and get your mil. history on paper, cause I wanna read it
You are totally off base.Someone tell me if I'm totally off base, but I think that this is unconstitutional. His reference to using it retroactively sounds like an Ex Post Facto Law which is explicitly called out in the Constitution in Section 9. Am I on base here or crazy. I'm no lawyer but my infringement senses are tingling.
View attachment 90074
View attachment 90075
I actually have a manuscript detailing my time in Syria. Never could find a publisher. It's over 800 pages
You are totally off base.
Basically this would be an order to enforce existing laws. Ex post facto is making someone a criminal for a prior act, where as this pertains to enforcement against prior acts.
Someone tell me if I'm totally off base, but I think that this is unconstitutional. His reference to using it retroactively sounds like an Ex Post Facto Law which is explicitly called out in the Constitution in Section 9. Am I on base here or crazy. I'm no lawyer but my infringement senses are tingling.
View attachment 90074
View attachment 90075
It might serve you well to team up with an author or professional writer.I actually have a manuscript detailing my time in Syria. Never could find a publisher. It's over 800 pages