How well are those industry standards working out for them? Time for a change or quit their bit chin.Have either of you ever been to a museum? This is pretty much industry standard. What isn't industry standard, though, is the drink that the kid has. That is odd.
And why was this not a hate crime?
OMG the double standard!
I'm not sure what the latter part of the second sentence means but I've been less than six inches from several, several priceless pieces of art....as have billions of other people in the Louvre and nothing seems to have happened.How well are those industry standards working out for them? Time for a change or quit their bit chin.
Honestly it's just impossible to know, I e heard ardent pro gun reps say they wouldn't mind banning high cap mags, rifles, etc....Oh come on, that takes effort. You're supposed to slap on a jersey and give blind support.
Thanks Hollywood fiction.Honestly it's just impossible to know, I e heard ardent pro gun reps say they wouldn't mind banning high cap mags, rifles, etc....
I've literally had a rep hand me his Glock in a gov building he wasn't allowed to have it in, and then have the gall to tell me that silencers were items for the criminally minded. He then proceeded to tell me he wouldn't shoot a man robbing him without first puffing up his chest and making sure the robber "really wanted to mess" with him.
I've voted for a few libertarians by affiliation or ideals. Ron, Rand, and won't name the 3rd.Absolutely, that's why I said it would be good enough. But that's a better question, who have you supported that's fought to expand gun rights and roll back the restrictions placed on them?
Ignorance is worse. I showed them ownership numbers, and then in a staff meeting I had a number of conservative staffers tell me that the "200 citizens max who own silencers need to prove they are worth hunting with, against the thousands of hunters that don't want them".Thanks Hollywood fiction.
A simple demonstration involving a pistol being near their ears would have proven effective.Ignorance is worse. I showed them ownership numbers, and then in a staff meeting I had a number of conservative staffers tell me that the "200 citizens max who own silencers need to prove they are worth hunting with, against the thousands of hunters that don't want them".
At that point I simply said, "that's where I differ, I think you should have to explain why they are not safe, not the other way around". Which somehow started a shit storm because apparently small gov principles are mind blowing in ga.