Public toilets?
- Thread starter Mac11FA
- Start date
-
- Tags
- accidents advertising airport alcohol allegations appendix apple watch basketball black blacklivesmatter blue china college community criminal darwin debate died dow election everyone panic! fraternity freedom growth gsw gun control has nothing to do with religion hillary holster i don't hate chrtistians international labor day low country boil law enforcement leo listen marketing mental illness money naacp nba negligent negligent discharge news not religious nra pharma police political correctness president property prozac race real estate rip security sensitivity service shaunking southeasttraders sports stupid this is about china tsa video watch white
Nope, that's when they'll take the high ground. Hey y'all, we don't sell those evil military grade bullet hoses, so come on in and buy some slave labor produced t-shirts!
They're worse than dicks.
I had posted this somewhere on the sight last week. I had an employee tell me this and that is why they are selling the ARs at deeply discounted pricing!
Sound's like a love triangle gone bad. I was listening to some radio station this morning and they were talking about banning guns and using the SH massacre to support their argument. Caller after caller was unable to justify a pro-gun answer. Needless to say, I am disappointed that I have to listen to regular radio after cancelling my Sirius subscription.
She works for the people with the real money and power. It's hard to see past the veil, but when you do, it starts to make sense.
It says something about humans when a piece of art that someone made in a day or two is worth more than some men will make in a lifetime. My favorite stories to read are where assholes buy 20 million dollar paintings to find out later that they are fake. I chuckle on the inside.
Absolutely, that's why I said it would be good enough. But that's a better question, who have you supported that's fought to expand gun rights and roll back the restrictions placed on them?
No, but you should never support those who want further reductions on something you consider so important. I didn'tt vote for McCain because he supported restrictions on free speech, or Romney because I didn't trust him I guns. If I followed your thinking, I may have voted for Romney, because guns were not an issue in the campaign and I couldn't see Sandy Hook in the near future.
Have either of you ever been to a museum? This is pretty much industry standard. What isn't industry standard, though, is the drink that the kid has. That is odd.
Why? If they have zero chance of any further reductions, but have a real chance of making positive changes for other issues that are important, why not? Do you vote for the candidate that you feel will have zero chance of accomplishing anything that you feel is important? That just doesn't make sense.
Yeah, and look at the conclusion that Forbes drew from the Walmart position..."Walmart bans the same of guns used in mass killings". That's exactly the message that walmart is sending.
Will you ever set foot in walmart again, now that they've made their stance on guns crystal clear?