Public toilets?
- Thread starter Mac11FA
- Start date
-
- Tags
- accidents advertising airport alcohol allegations appendix apple watch basketball black blacklivesmatter blue china college community criminal darwin debate died dow election everyone panic! fraternity freedom growth gsw gun control has nothing to do with religion hillary holster i don't hate chrtistians international labor day low country boil law enforcement leo listen marketing mental illness money naacp nba negligent negligent discharge news not religious nra pharma police political correctness president property prozac race real estate rip security sensitivity service shaunking southeasttraders sports stupid this is about china tsa video watch white
Some motivations are more important than others. For once a shooting will be more about the victims than the killers, but only because of who the killer is and why he did it.
DoglegArms
Silencer Dealer of 2015, 2016, 2017
Boo fucking hoo. Here you have an adult who could not figure out how to function socially in society.
This was a hate crime as far as I'm concerned.
I don't think any politician on any ballot is as pro-gun as I am, so probably none. For sure none are 100% pro-gun. So zero.
THey made a statement that the were no longer going to sell "assault rifles" that are used in mass killings. If that's not fucking political (and completely fucking idiotic), I don't know what is.
I used to love the Thinking Man Tavern, and a pet food store very near my house. The Man, put up a no guns sign, I emailed the manager and told them I'd never come back. Same with the pet food place. The pet food store emailed me back to say they took their sign down. I've gone back there.
Last edited:
I see you still haven't understood the point I made several paged back. I give careful consideration to political climate, possibility of an anti-gun law being passed (or pro-gun law being passed) depending on the political climate, as well as a number of other issues that are important, and the odds that they will receive favorable legislative action as well.
This is really simple, I'm not sure why you're having a hard time. I'll vote for an anti-gun politician if they have zero chance of passing anti-gun legislation, but can pass other legislation that I support. That's just the most tactically correct way to approach the choice. That might not be the touchy feely way, but it's my logical way of looking at candidates and their potential It's never failed me yet.
Excellent rating by NRA. Pat Ricketts.
There's hundreds of articles about them not selling, I haven't seen anything where they say it's stopping because ARs are used in mass shootings.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/08/25/wal-mart-abandons-ar-15-shooters-good/
This is as close to a statement from the company that I've seen.
I can't believe any of you still think voting at the federal level actually effects anything in a positive manner.
Who is that? The only Google result is a Nebraska school board member.
And like I said, your stance on guns takes a back seat to other things you care about.
I wonder why, if not for political reasons, they'd eliminate EVERY firearm they sell that holds more than 7 rounds. Hmmmm, you don't have to be the head cashier at said walmart to figure that one out. Why would they eliminate AR's and keep fucking wingmasters?