Assault rifles..lol. Laughing all the while we get collectively poked up the butt.
For real...never shot one of those...
Assault rifles..lol. Laughing all the while we get collectively poked up the butt.
By the time I got to the POV video it was removed but the other is sickening... The poor girl's screams are something else...
Wow...that must be some shit hole if people hang out at Walmart.Fuck Walmart. They are over rated anyways. The one here in Griffin aint nothing but a hangout for everybody. Seeing kids walk around in packs and shit with earbuds in. Dont even have a buggy! I will build my own AR, buy one locally or hit up budsgunshop.com
Tru Dat!Wow...that must be some shit hole if people hang out at Walmart.
Political at every level. Why else would they stop selling them? One reason..just one that's not 100% political in nature.
The fuck if I do. I have very broad political interests and it's always a balancing act. I would never vote for a candidate if I thought they had a shot of further resticting gun rights in the term of their service.
WTF does this mean? That a vote for Obama isn't an anti gun vote, because you knew he wouldn't be able to get it done? What if the constant anti gun drumbeat makes gun control more likely after their "term of service", would you hold any responsibility for that? Do you think that voting for the minority party, democrats in the state of Georgia, isn't anti gun, because they aren't in power at the time you cast your vote? I'm assuming you voted for Obama, if you didn't please correct me.if I thought they had a shot of further resticting gun rights in the term of their service.
In 2008 guns weren't on the radar before or during the election..not at all. It was avoided all throughout the debates, and I knew that area of interest would be safe, so I could vote against McCain. In 2012, different story. Gun rights were all of a sudden a topic, and there was a possibility a President could have made a dent. I decided not to vote for the anti-gun candidate or Obama. I abstained from voting for President in 2012.1. The only time buying ARs at Wal-Mart was a decent deal was the 2 years after Sandy Hook because they didn't raise their prices. The were overpriced before and they are overpriced now. With the margins on "tactical" weapons what they are now, they decided to concentrate on higher margin hunting weapons and dedicate the valuable display real estate to them.
WTF does this mean? That a vote for Obama isn't an anti gun vote, because you knew he wouldn't be able to get it done? What if the constant anti gun drumbeat makes gun control more likely after their "term of service", would you hold any responsibility for that? Do you think that voting for the minority party, democrats in the state of Georgia, isn't anti gun, because they aren't in power at the time you cast your vote? I'm assuming you voted for Obama, if you didn't please correct me.
In 2008 guns weren't on the radar before or during the election..not at all. It was avoided all throughout the debates, and I knew that area of interest would be safe, so I could vote against McCain. In 2012, different story. Gun rights were all of a sudden a topic, and there was a possibility a President could have made a dent. I decided not to vote for the anti-gun candidate or Obama. I abstained from voting for President in 2012.
You have to look at the political climate, and think about what's possible given the make up of Congress, public sentiment, etc etc. It's a lot harder than just picking someone and riding the wagon, *gasp* you actually have to give the decision careful consideration.
He was, but he had no way to do anything. I'm not out to wage some sort of meaningless ideological battle, I care about real, tangible results or lack thereof. If an anti-gun candidate gets into office and accomplishes nothing and leaves, it means nothing.Obama was anti gun in 2008. Every vote you cast for anyone with a D next to their name is an anti gun vote, and gives the anti gun side ammunition. Even the pro gun democrats are for expanded background checks and magazine restrictions. I've noticed you expect the voters on the other side to protect your gun rights by holding every R candidate to a 2a purity test that no one on the left could pass.
It must be hard being the only one that's a rational political actor, rather than just riding a teams wagon. I feel for you.
He was, but he had no way to do anything. I'm not out to wage some sort of meaningless ideological battle, I care about real, tangible results or lack thereof. If an anti-gun candidate gets into office and accomplishes nothing and leaves, it means nothing.
What ammunition did I give them? Did it matter if they didn't accomplish anything, and that is what I calculated would happen?
Results are everything. That's all they do. Propose ideas and get them implemented or not. There isn't some anti gun and pro gun aura that's floating around making changes in policy. WHen you have a complex belief system, you have to make compromises and take risks with votes, otherwise you'd never have a say.
Question. Will you continue shopping at walmart after their anti-gun public statement?
If that's what you gleaned from that, then you didn't understand a single thing I said.So, in truth, your beliefs about guns take a back seat to your other views.
If that's what you gleaned from that, then you didn't understand a single thing I said.
Are you going to continue shopping at walmart?