Public toilets?
- Thread starter Mac11FA
- Start date
-
- Tags
- accidents advertising airport alcohol allegations appendix apple watch basketball black blacklivesmatter blue china college community criminal darwin debate died dow election everyone panic! fraternity freedom growth gsw gun control has nothing to do with religion hillary holster i don't hate chrtistians international labor day low country boil law enforcement leo listen marketing mental illness money naacp nba negligent negligent discharge news not religious nra pharma police political correctness president property prozac race real estate rip security sensitivity service shaunking southeasttraders sports stupid this is about china tsa video watch white
I question how much it truly matters (and yes I remember the m855 opinion)Here ya go, but you may want to write your own as well. Rumor is the ATF has screened out copy/paste type submissions. Not sure if it's true, but I wouldn't doubt it.
Comment on the ATF’s Proposed Rule Changes to Pistol Braces
SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT TO THE ATF ↗If the button doesn't work, try clicking here to submit a formal comment.Please note: For your comment to be considered valid, it MUST include the docket numbgunowners.org
We have to light them up. It's why we can still buy M855. This type of thing works, and it matters greatly.
It matters greatly. Can you buy new tins of 7N6? Nope..no one commented. Cant you buy M855? Yep, because the issue was dropped because of the massive amount of comments received. Don't be apathetic. It absolutely makes a difference.
Yeah I watched the Mr.Guns and Gear video too
Did the ATF receive thousand upon thousands of opinions against banning bump stocks? Yes.
Did they ban bumpstocks?
Yes.
And pretty sure I’m the complete fucking opposite of “apathetic” when it comes to the BATFE Lol
I haven't seen that video, but I'll check it out.
The bump stock issue was via Executive Order. This is internal from the ATF. Big difference.
Sorry, I don't know you from Adam.
You should visit other threads on here
Bump stock was ATF internal decision, possibly driven by POTUS (it was already under review since Vegas).
- Jul 5, 2015
- 6,135
- 30,134
- 113
- Zip code
- 30022
bathroom flooded and we have floor vents
- Jul 5, 2015
- 6,135
- 30,134
- 113
- Zip code
- 30022
I know you well. I did comment btw. I hope it helps, but I'm not holding my breath.
Democrats have argued that legislation is needed to ban them, given the ATF's finding that it lacked the authority to ban the devices under current law.
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, who first proposed legislation to ban bump stocks in 2013, said Trump should call on congressional Republicans to "stop blocking" legislation she introduced with fellow Democrats after the Las Vegas shooting. It would ban bump stocks, trigger cranks and similar accessories that accelerate a semi-automatic rifle’s rate of fire.
“If ATF tries to ban these devices after admitting repeatedly that it lacks the authority to do so, that process could be tied up in court for years, and that would mean bump stocks would continue to be sold," she said in a statement. "Legislation is the only answer."