I like 1911s as much as the next guy. I own two myself. And for the record - I never said that Glock was THE best, only that they make a solid weapon.
I like 1911s as much as the next guy. I own two myself. And for the record - I never said that Glock was THE best, only that they make a solid weapon.
If the government didn't restrict them, the demand would go up, production and supply would increase and prices would come down. I get both sides, but the government not wanting me to have it, makes me feel like I should have it.I'll give you a few reasons:
Materials aren't free.
Machining equipment isnt free.
Skilled labor is not free.
Running a business is not free.
Do you think silencer manf shouldn't profit? Dealers shouldn't profit either?
I seriously don't get the anti silencer/NFA sentiment that goes around here. There's a ton of shit I don't like but I don't start threads about it.
And before someone comments that my opinion is biased and doesn't count, my profit margin to members on this forum is 1/2 to 3/4 less than normal.
I agree prices would go down but not significantly, not at first. Manf in the firearms industry pay taxes out the ass. Raw materials would still cost the same. Machines would still cost the same, maintenance would increase. There's only so many cans that can be made in a production run without purchasing more equipment and labor, which increases cost.If the government didn't restrict them, the demand would go up, production and supply would increase and prices would come down. I get both sides, but the government not wanting me to have it, makes me feel like I should have it.
I think if people saw the machining at the factories like dead air or Dobbs they would see the massive amount of effort that goes into these cans. The amount of time and what your prospective total sales are really help understand the price.I'll give you a few reasons:
Materials aren't free.
Machining equipment isnt free.
Skilled labor is not free.
Running a business is not free.
Do you think silencer manf shouldn't profit? Dealers shouldn't profit either?
I seriously don't get the anti silencer/NFA sentiment that goes around here. There's a ton of shit I don't like but I don't start threads about it.
And before someone comments that my opinion is biased and doesn't count, my profit margin to members on this forum is 1/2 to 3/4 less than normal.
I agree prices would go down but not significantly, not at first. Manf in the firearms industry pay taxes out the ass. Raw materials would still cost the same. Machines would still cost the same, maintenance would increase. There's only so many cans that can be made in a production run without purchasing more equipment and labor, which increases cost.
I think if people saw the machining at the factories like dead air or Dobbs they would see the massive amount of effort that goes into these cans. The amount of time and what your prospective total sales are really help understand the price.
I think every single silencer manf would disagree with you. There's great detail in the design of a can. Plus we're talking about SS and titanium, not only aluminum.My opinion is based on my experience with car stuff. There is no shortage of machined shapes like aluminum heads, accessory brackets, suspension pieces, etc that are more complex than an average suppressor. Cost by material volume/quality and time/complexity are significantly out of balance in comparison. Still, this isn't an 'anti-suppressor' thread.
I think every single silencer manf would disagree with you. There's great detail in the design of a can. Plus we're talking about SS and titanium, not only aluminum.
I disagree for the most part. If they were deregulated you could make them in China for way less than $20 for sure. Stainless steel is not an expensive material.I think every single silencer manf would disagree with you. There's great detail in the design of a can. Plus we're talking about SS and titanium, not only aluminum.
I disagree for the most part. If they were deregulated you could make them in China for way less than $20 for sure. Stainless steel is not an expensive material.
Sure ok.I disagree for the most part. If they were deregulated you could make them in China for way less than $20 for sure. Stainless steel is not an expensive material.
I'm also guessing much larger operations are machining car partsMy opinion is based on my experience with car stuff. There is no shortage of machined shapes like aluminum heads, accessory brackets, suspension pieces, etc that are more complex than an average suppressor. Cost by material volume/quality and time/complexity are significantly out of balance in comparison. Still, this isn't an 'anti-suppressor' thread.
Ruger seems to be fast pushing towards the way of cast baffle suppressors. If that becomes acceptable to buyers it could really drop prices.Of course, if they were being mass produced by the thousands like the above mentioned automobile parts. Suppressors at least in the United States are manufactured in small batches by small companies and that keeps production costs high.
I agree. With more demand and decreased regulation I think prices would plummet for cheaply made suppressors. There would still be a market for premium cans for sure but if tthey were available for under $100 they would sell a ton and I think it would be possible. If Apple can make an iPhone for $200 somevody can make a suppressor very cheap. How much does it cost to make an oil filter?Of course, if they were being mass produced by the thousands like the above mentioned automobile parts. Suppressors at least in the United States are manufactured in small batches by small companies and that keeps production costs high.
It's really not as super high tech as these companies make it seem. I could build a pretty decent can in my basement for $100. Nobody is doing that right now because if you are already paying a $200 tax it's not worth saving a few bucks. Well actually some people still are doing that right now but not manySure ok.
And almost all of them provide a lifetime warrantyI think every single silencer manf would disagree with you. There's great detail in the design of a can. Plus we're talking about SS and titanium, not only aluminum.
Do it. We'll compare it to any HTA can and if yours is quieter I'll buy you the HTA can and tax stamp.It's really not as super high tech as these companies make it seem. I could build a pretty decent can in my basement for $100. Nobody is doing that right now because if you are already paying a $200 tax it's not worth saving a few bucks. Well actually some people still are doing that right now but not many
For years, I had no interest in suppressors. Mainly because they were expensive and partially because I didn't think I would have need for one. The juice didn't seem worth the squeeze. Now, I own three, with another pending.I'm sure they would, but they have a vested interest in pushing the perceived value of their product as high as possible. As well they should. Aluminum is only a single example for any industry, but there are plenty of exotic mixtures used in wide ranging application. Regardless, I'm only saying that I'm not sold on the value - yet. There are plenty who are, and the discussion brought out many ringing endorsements for your stuff.
Its nothing against you or anyone in the biz. Im not saying you can make the best can in the world for super cheap. Im just saying that the reason these things cost so much has more to do with the regulation (and the decrease in demand it creates) than it does with the actual manufacturing cost. Building a silencer is not rocket science. The technology has not changed much since they were first invented.Do it. We'll compare it to any HTA can and if yours is quieter I'll buy you the HTA can and tax stamp.