I somewhat agree, but if it did work, it seems like it would be really fast.Seems like a gimmick that wouldn't work well in practice
For $200 you can find outI somewhat agree, but if it did work, it seems like it would be really fast.
The main purpose is to put money in the maker's pocket.im confused. it seems as though this is meant mainly for close quarters fast acquisition but in most close quarters fast acquisition scenarios your not even going to be looking at the sight but just pointing and shooting
I dig it, but im curious about the internal alignment of the center dot and outer circle. Is that not just two things with an insanely short sight radius?
I guess that makes sense but it looked like they were two separate things inside the sight as the camera view went across the back of the sight.That's like worrying about the sight radius of a red dot. When it's close to aligned you just see the center dot, then the outer ring comes into view as you align your eye behind the sight.
It's different that's for sure.... As far as being fast I'd still like to try the ATS sights. They're just ugly as hell. And probably a gimmick as well.... View attachment 24743
Yeah I think I'll just stick to my Truglo night sights. LOL. They haven't let me down yet!I owned a Steyr (spelling?) M9 or some such name pistol for a little while- it had similar X-wing fighter sights on it... they sucked in practice. Just my opinion. Sold that thing not long after taking it to the range. Although the grip was as or more comfortable than anything else I can remember shooting.