Good to know Verticoli!!Verticoli said:If the SRs are like Gs, you don't want anything in that channel. It has a neoprene liner that has all the lubricity needed.
Good to know Verticoli!!Verticoli said:If the SRs are like Gs, you don't want anything in that channel. It has a neoprene liner that has all the lubricity needed.
+1...Amen to that bigdog! A great info resource! Yogi 8)bigdogdaddy said:Gotta love youtube. That is where I have learned a lot of disassembly and reassembly for my guns.
SkipD said:I checked the owner's manuals for both the SR9c and the Glock 19 and neither have any instructions for removal of the striker for cleaning. Are any of y'all finding instructions from the respective factories for the average (non-gunsmith) user/owner to do this sort of detailed disassembly and reassembly? I'm sure that many of us don't find it difficult, but I really wonder how important this is for regular maintenance if the factories don't suggest it in the owner's manuals.
RugerRon60 said:I emailed Ruger to see what they recommend:
Response:
We would recommend cleaning of the striker channel about every 200 to 300 rounds, depending on what type of ammunition you are shooting.
AquaHull said:This is from the same company that states that the S&B ammo has soft primers, Taurus says S&B has too hard primers, and CZ proofs their guns with S&B ammo.
It might be time to buy a better gun.
Denny4kids said:OK, I confess, My SR9c has over 3000 rounds through her and I have never cleaned the striker. All that I have done is spray a cleaner, blow dry, and spray lube. The slide and other parts get special grease. I don't use this weapon for IDPA anymore but I still run a few stages with her to stay fresh. She will get a full strip and clean soon. This is my full time carry weapon. Den
AquaHull said:My new SR-22 Pistol will be the telltale on whether or not a great company has floundered. It is currently working as expected.
RugerRon60 said:Oh and love the Remora with full sweat shield.
mayonardo said:AquaHull said:My new SR-22 Pistol will be the telltale on whether or not a great company has floundered. It is currently working as expected.
I have to jump in here with a different perspective. First, I am not trying to start a fight, nor be disrespectful, but I am disagreeing with your statement above.
Simply put, to put a few issues one has had with a few guns from a company that enjoys a good reputation of quality, a long history, and a production output in the millions, as evidence of "...a great company has floundered." is statistically invalid and extremely premature. I can cite just the opposite history with Ruger firearms, as can many others.
At this point, neither I nor Ruger knows the ultimate cause of the issues you experienced. Perhaps they were the result of quality control issues with Ruger manufacturing. Perhaps not. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I'd offer that when producing millions of units of any thing, including railroad spikes, there will be a few quality issues. One major facet of Ruger's reputation is their absolute willingness to take care of customers' legitimate issues with their firearms.
Your opinions are your own, of course, but mine are different and I wanted to offer another voice.
Best regards,
I think I'll take some time off from here as well, since many are transplants from the old LCP forum and have the thought process.
Logging out, removing all cookies, and bookmarks.
bigdogdaddy said:That was not my first time to be dissed. Aquahull has seemed a little agitated lately. Maybe he will be back after a little cool down.