Time to start dropping bombs and let Allah sortem out
Are you afraid of shark attacks?[/QUOT
Considering the source, that means so much to me.. I'll just sit here , taking comfort in the fact you'd never say that shit to my face.
A fabrication. It was a joke.What exactly is a muslim no-go zone? Honest question.
"The gunman, who has yet to be publicly identified, was killed at the scene. But multiple news outlets identified the suspected shooter as 24-year-old Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez".
Wow, a flea ridden, pig fucking Muslim. Imagine that.
A fabrication. It was a joke.
I actually pulled a map of republican/democrat voters. It was a play on a bs news story that fox ran a few months ago where they created fake Muslim no go zones in Paris and ran it as a real story.I see... The map didnt look right to me, there was way too much blue in SC.
No need to be a dick. I'll respond to a civilly posed question.
My point is that it is still incredibly unlikely (just as unlikely as it was in the 80's...may less so according to FBI violent crime stats) of being killed in a shooting than it is to be killed by a drunk driver.
In other words, for the logically challenged, it's still a pretty damned safe place to live..regardless of the sensationalized news you have read to you.
Are you? Are you afraid of shark attacks? @kingsix
Are you? Are you afraid of shark attacks? @kingsix
My logic was/is sound, he just failed to correctly interpret what I was saying. I said the numbers were insignificant statistically, not the people. He tried to turn it into some ideological battle where there wasn't one.I believe @kingsix, who is very emotional about this shooting being a veteran as we all should be as Americans, point is that your statement is using a logical fallacy and not speaking directly to the story.
My logic was/is sound, he just failed to correctly interpret what I was saying. I said the numbers were insignificant statistically, not the people. He tried to turn it into some ideological battle where there wasn't one.
Neither is saying that someone is fucking retarded as your first comment out of the gate. you could probably see how that affected the tenor of my reply.Fine... however you were dipping your toes into baiting him and that's not cool. If someone disagrees with you, which many often do, state your point and move on...don't beat people over the head with it and bait them into saying something they shouldn't out of emotion... that's not cool bro.
"I try to be aware of my surroundings, weather its Bubba, Luther, or mohammad", - So, you're in a room with these three people, which one in your opinion is most likely to draw a gun and start screaming "ali akbar"? Yep, I agree and that's the same one I'm readying myself for in case I need to draw.
Yeah, but that's kind of like walking up to somebody holding their dead loved one in their arms and saying " why are you so upset? This is statistically insignificant. Most of us lived through the day".My logic was/is sound, he just failed to correctly interpret what I was saying. I said the numbers were insignificant statistically, not the people. He tried to turn it into some ideological battle where there wasn't one.