Good question!! In Nam the 50s barrels had to be changed after so many rounds due to warping. As far as your question, if only 30 rounds hot I would think, due to expansion of barrel from heat there would be less friction. On a cold barrel there would be more, but I have no Idea! Looking forward to the discussion on this topic. Thank Pimp Hat Man!So does your barrel wear the same whether it is hot or not?
Do the 30 rounds after a mag dump wear the barrel faster than 30 cold shots?
I think this goes back to the barrel wear testing someone did to compare Wolf vs. "good" brass cased ammo. I remember one of the theories as to why the Wolf ammo was harder on the barrel involved the variance in projectile diameter. The argument was that smaller projectiles allowed hot gas to escape around the projectile, thereby accelerating barrel wear.
If the barrel steel expands, the projectile does not. This, in theory, allows gas to escape forward of the projectile similar to the Wolf argument above.
We don't need no engineering here. Either pull info out your rear or move on, this is the internets.
Short answer is hot barrels erode faster. If I can figure out how to attach it I'll send a report on it that breaks down why.
I think this goes back to the barrel wear testing someone did to compare Wolf vs. "good" brass cased ammo. I remember one of the theories as to why the Wolf ammo was harder on the barrel involved the variance in projectile diameter. The argument was that smaller projectiles allowed hot gas to escape around the projectile, thereby accelerating barrel wear.
If the barrel steel expands, the projectile does not. This, in theory, allows gas to escape forward of the projectile similar to the Wolf argument above.
The hotter it is, the greater the wear.So does your barrel wear the same whether it is hot or not?
Do the 30 rounds after a mag dump wear the barrel faster than 30 cold shots?
If you're referring to the lucky gunner test, it was determined that the mild steel jacket used in projectiles of the Wolf ammo caused greater wear.I think this goes back to the barrel wear testing someone did to compare Wolf vs. "good" brass cased ammo. I remember one of the theories as to why the Wolf ammo was harder on the barrel involved the variance in projectile diameter. The argument was that smaller projectiles allowed hot gas to escape around the projectile, thereby accelerating barrel wear.
If the barrel steel expands, the projectile does not. This, in theory, allows gas to escape forward of the projectile similar to the Wolf argument above.
If you're referring to the lucky gunner test, it was determined that the mild steel jacket used in projectiles of the Wolf ammo caused greater wear.
She's doing great, the youngest has joined her now. I now stay busy with them and life, and only drop by here on very rare occasions. (And other places never)Cool.
Hey, didn't know you were on this site.
Thanks for your response!
How's your daughter and her shooting exploits?
Glad to see you Shrek! (mtdawg169 on the other site)She's doing great, the youngest has joined her now. I now stay busy with them and life, and only drop by here on very rare occasions. (And other places never)