What do I need to know about this? How is it enforced? Google gives me a lot of different information so I figured I'd ask here
Cool. Thanks. What if I were to sbr something (I'm looking at a CZ Scorpion)? I assume that would be"building" something. Would it be important then because of the additional NFA paperwork?It is not enforced and it not illegal to be in possession of a non compliant 922r weapon, only to build one or import one.
Basically, don't rape, kill, pillage, and burn and the ATF won't coming looking for 922r violations.
It's really a non issue trumped up by blowhards on the internet.
Cool. Thanks. What if I were to sbr something (I'm looking at a CZ Scorpion)? I assume that would be"building" something. Would it be important then because of the additional NFA paperwork?
This is what I don't understand. You say it's not enforced and it only an issue because of "internet blowhards" but then you say don't take any weapons out of compliance...
And there's the rub. It doesn't matter...but it does.This is what I don't understand. You say it's not enforced and it only an issue because of "internet blowhards" but then you say don't take any weapons out of compliance...
What did you change? I'm doing an m85 sbr.And there's the rub. It doesn't matter...but it does.
I ran in to this when I put together my M92 PAP SBR. I got all sort of conflicting information regarding 922(r) compliance and SBR's. Some said that the NFA status trumped 922(r) and other disagreed. I decided that for my piece of mind, I'd make sure that the rifle was 922(r) compliant. As NWS said, the reality of 922(r) compliance ever being checked is slim to none...but should you roll the dice and build something out of compliance? It's not a risk that I am willing to take.
http://www.tapco.com/section922r/Is there an easy to understand source describing what you need to have to be in compliance?
Nothing that I wouldn't have changed anyway. I swapped out the FCG with a TAPCO, replaced the buttstock, pistol grip, furniture, and added a muzzle device. The only thing that cost me money that I wouldn't have spent was the buttstock. I had to get the USA vcrsion and it was about $80 more than the Bulgarian version. Everything is something I would have swapped anyways, just had to make sure it swapped for a USA part.What did you change? I'm doing an m85 sbr.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That's what I was thinking. I've done it before on Saiga conversions I was just wondering specifically on this pistol.Nothing that I wouldn't have changed anyway. I swapped out the FCG with a TAPCO, replaced the buttstock, pistol grip, furniture, and added a muzzle device. The only thing that cost me money that I wouldn't have spent was the buttstock. I had to get the USA vcrsion and it was about $80 more than the Bulgarian version. Everything is something I would have swapped anyways, just had to make sure it swapped for a USA part.
Also, here's a good worksheet to check your build.
http://thegunwiki.com/Gunwiki/BuildAkVerifyCompliance
If you've done a Saiga, it's the exact same thing minus relocating the trigger guard.That's what I was thinking. I've done it before on Saiga conversions I was just wondering specifically on this pistol.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
They are going to provide a kit in addition to the stock to make it compliant. It should be very straightforward.Cool. Thanks. What if I were to sbr something (I'm looking at a CZ Scorpion)? I assume that would be"building" something. Would it be important then because of the additional NFA paperwork?
I have seen the kits i just never really fully understood the rules and why some people say it doesn't matterThey are going to provide a kit in addition to the stock to make it compliant. It should be very straightforward.
It is not enforced and it not illegal to be in possession of a non compliant 922r weapon, only to build one or import one.
Basically, don't rape, kill, pillage, and burn and the ATF won't coming looking for 922r violations.
It's really a non issue trumped up by blowhards on the internet.
This is entirely incorrect advice.
Just because there are not many prosecutions, doesn't mean there won't be......
If the ATF can get away with "constructive possession" of a class III weapon, they can get away with anything.
(And really-who can afford to be the "nanner-nanner boo-boo" guy in federal court?) Finding out whether or not you are right costs 100k..... And if you lose, you go to "federal pound me in the ass penetentiary" for a decade.
No thanks! Just comply with 922r.
This is entirely incorrect advice.
Just because there are not many prosecutions, doesn't mean there won't be......
If the ATF can get away with "constructive possession" of a class III weapon, they can get away with anything.
(And really-who can afford to be the "nanner-nanner boo-boo" guy in federal court?) Finding out whether or not you are right costs 100k..... And if you lose, you go to "federal pound me in the ass penetentiary" for a decade.
No thanks! Just comply with 922r.