Public toilets?
- Thread starter Mac11FA
- Start date
-
- Tags
- accidents advertising airport alcohol allegations appendix apple watch basketball black blacklivesmatter blue china college community criminal darwin debate died dow election everyone panic! fraternity freedom growth gsw gun control has nothing to do with religion hillary holster i don't hate chrtistians international labor day low country boil law enforcement leo listen marketing mental illness money naacp nba negligent negligent discharge news not religious nra pharma police political correctness president property prozac race real estate rip security sensitivity service shaunking southeasttraders sports stupid this is about china tsa video watch white
The only way to maybe put an end to this is to end qualified immunity for government officials.
Fucked up. Getting shot for minding your own business in your own house. I'm not a cop basher, but this type of stuff makes me understand cop bashers.
Where's @Ken Ford? We need another perspective. This thread would start a 50 page fight, with infractions being handed out, at TOS.
Just like a power hungry mod. Screw reporting just ultimate ban. I like the way you roll.
when I saw it yesterday, I remember my grandma always saying about the color of a wolly worm and the upcoming winter
im not up for a blizzard, if I was id just move back to OH
- Jul 5, 2015
- 6,135
- 30,134
- 113
- Zip code
- 30022
A house that fit the description?
Couldn't the 911 caller give a freakin' address number?
Those officers were putting their lives on the line to protect lives and property and sounds like they screwed the pooch in the process.
Couldn't the 911 caller give a freakin' address number?
Those officers were putting their lives on the line to protect lives and property and sounds like they screwed the pooch in the process.
Let me state the obvious.
It isn't the rigor by which scientists have collected data, formulated hypotheses, tested results, and submitted those conclusions for peer review that bothers you...how could it. It's extremely thorough, and outside of google cut and paste, you don't have a clue about the scientific method or how rigorous the thousands of scientists are that use it. You simply paint with the broadest brush imaginable and say "they" aren't rigorous. But why? Would you do such a thing?
Simple. You don't like their results. You, with opinion not grounded in the rigors of scientific pursuit, but emotion. But why are you so emotional about it? Again, simple. People identify with facets of their culture very strongly, (not all, but most), and anyone that doesn't find value in it, or dismisses it as unimportant in less than valuable has attacked the lifestyle of that person. You don't want to feel like those limp wristed lefties might be onto something. Climate change...meh, I don't want to consider the possibility that my lifestyle has to change.
Your simply exhibiting the same behavior that an owner of brand "x" does, when someone says they don't like brand "x". Their like or dislike shouldn't mean anything to you, but for some reason you feel compelled to defend your choice in choosing brand "x". Sound familiar? It should, because it's a human psychological behavior that's exhibited the world over, and it's totally illogical. That's the type of illogical thinking that allows a person with zero professional scientific training in the field of climate change to feel like their opinion matters, or that it's valid. It isn't.
If you care to rebuke this, please cite the methods by which you've invalidated their findings.
Wow, could you be any more incorrect or paint with a broader brush?
Science doesn't fail by the way.
I'll play devil's advocate:
Screw the "home Owner", surely he was doing something illegal otherwise he wouldn't have made his house look like that of a criminal's house. Don't come crying to us when you suddenly need a cop to come kill your dog.
I can tell you what I'm not and that's a criminal....criminal.