Public toilets?
- Thread starter Mac11FA
- Start date
-
- Tags
- accidents advertising airport alcohol allegations appendix apple watch basketball black blacklivesmatter blue china college community criminal darwin debate died dow election everyone panic! fraternity freedom growth gsw gun control has nothing to do with religion hillary holster i don't hate chrtistians international labor day low country boil law enforcement leo listen marketing mental illness money naacp nba negligent negligent discharge news not religious nra pharma police political correctness president property prozac race real estate rip security sensitivity service shaunking southeasttraders sports stupid this is about china tsa video watch white
Me neither, but that doesn't stop airops from texting me naked selfies. It's so confusing here.
Sweet reply and graph with zero corresponding evidence. Yes, the worlds best are simply hacks compared to the combined intellect of the worlds untrained internet science commandos.It is real simple:
Those "climate scientists" simply do not comply with the scientific method.
They are not scientists. They are fools.
Pretty simple.
Here's a flow chart. You obviously need infographics.
They comply with none of this.
Stop being smart asshole. You should just believe what you are told. What is wrong with you? Scientists are stupid bro. I heard they went to university of phoenix.
@Hoss's Mom and @Hoss have both sent me naked selfies; I'd take @AirOpsMgr over either of them in a heartbeat
POOF. There goes my mind. You suck. I cant even sleep tonight now.
The fucker can sure mop a floor better than either of the other two.
Please don't. I just stopped throwing up over the caitlyn pics. My stomach hurts dammit.
The Weather Channel went south after all the cute weather girls left! Who can forget Christina Abernathy?!?!?!?
Yep-
Just like the "scientists" who promoted eugenics almost 100 years ago to try and breed a super race. Back then, you would see "the debate is over" and "the science is settled" and such and so.
Anyone who dared to disagree with the "experts" on eugenics would not get promoted in their academic careers, they would lose grants and funding, and they would get laughed at by "real" scientists.
Eugenics is not taken seriously now.
Newton based a lot of his calculations on something called "ether." It was a colorless, tasteless gas with special properties to make some of his more uncomfortable predictions work. Real "scientists" took this "ether" very seriously for a few hundred years. The "science was settled" a long, ling time before a clown named Einstein came along and ripped humanity forward by an immeasurable amount. All because he didn't buy the company line about this fishy "ether" stuff.
There are many examples like this. "Eugenics" was not scientifically tested and proven. Neither was "ether." Neither is "climate change." It is simply propaganda. The morons who preach it can't even agree on what effects it is supposed to have. They can't even agree on the questions to ask.
Not science. Not one bit.
It's because scientists are gay. I heard sarah pallin say that so it must be true.
Lolz. Science tried eugenics, result: never trust the evolution of technology, human understanding, or the scientific method.