I torture tested mine by exposing it to one hour of The View. It failed...I'll carry it with pride.
In my opinion, the VP9 fire control group is seriously over-engineered. Way too many parts to accomplish the simple task of releasing a striker. Quite frankly, I think that's why it failed in the video. Too easy for a bit of grit to get in between small parts and lock things up.
I owned a USPc 45 at one point it time.
it was heavy for its size, only held 8+1, so-so trigger, expensive, and had that godawful mag release.
this is my issue with HKs. I had a USP compact that I wanted to love sooo bad but i could not for the life of me hit the mag release. It was like fucking child proof. I want to like HKs but that is the biggest turn off to me.
its so unnatural feeling to me. i never could find it without looking and taking my hand half ass off the gun.
I wouldnt want to defend my life with one as of now...
The mag release - while not optimal - was not a deal breaker for me.
The whole pistol was kind of "meh" when compared with my CZ and and sig 226 that I owned at the same time.
I now own none of those but the CZ is the only one I regret selling.
The whole pistol was kind of "meh" when compared with my CZ and and sig 226 that I owned at the same time.
I now own none of those but the CZ is the only one I regret selling.
H
Hoss
Guest
I sold/traded away my P07 after a class in the middle of August. We were doing failure drills. We would shoot a mag, drop the gun, run 50 yards back, tag up, run back, insert a new mag, rack the slide, shoot another mag, repeat... After the 2nd round my hands were so sweaty that I literally could not effectively grip the low profile slide of the P07 enough to rack the slide. I was shocked and quite pissed. I switched over to an XD9 and was able to continue with no issues. The instructor said he sees this a lot with people that bring CZ's and CZ clones to his classes.
