Ok, I honestly could care less if the current women's Bantamweight champion could beat a man. It is 100% a moot point. She will not be fighting a transgendered individual any time in the foreseeable future. Why would the UFC put their poster girl in a freak show match? It doesn't make sense for anyone.Why would she get a man below her weight class if men have to fight men in their weight class? See, we are admitting she can't beat a man.
Why would Mayweather, a boxer, be in an MMA fight? That's a ridiculous thing to say.
"For the record, George St.Pierre would take Michael Phelps OUT!"... D'uh. Irrelevant comment is irrelevant.
Anyway, your assumption that I was being a misogynist is, also, wrong. I quoted someone saying a woman should fight a man weighing less than her. I say no special treatment. Women want to fight men? Ok, but it's a regular fight.
Context man, it's all about context. I am not advocating "cisgender" anything. I used the word misogynist talking about a women fighting a man, not a shemale fighting a women.I would take Mayweather over her. Using the word "misogynist" just proves you've been brainwashed, next it'll be "cisgender".
Tell that to everyone who purchased UFC 118. MMA was founded to showcase which discipline was more effective. So striker vs. grappler was a large part of that.Only pundits want to see a boxer fight in mma. If I want to see a boxer fight I'll watch boxing. If I want to see an mma fighter fight I watch mma. I don't want to see a BJJ guy in a boxing match or an archer in IPSC or a kayaker in tennis.
That's hilarious. She wouldn't stand a chance.Ok then Rhonda Rousey would be most trained men fighters the same weight as her. Better?
You would think those dykes could have made it more of a game. My HS team in my sophomore year could've probably taken them.http://www.wagoosh.ca/article/post/womans-olympic-hockey-team-loses-to-a-high-school-boys-team
The U.S. women's Olympic hockey team prepped for the Olympics by scrimmaging against HS boys teams, and would lose.