Love you too bb@Bigigloopt2 <3 u even though I'm throwing bombs in the am
Love you too bb@Bigigloopt2 <3 u even though I'm throwing bombs in the am
3x dropping bombs like NagasakiWhat are we protesting again?
I’m protesting all the protesting!What are we protesting again?
6 rounds of 9mm
I’m protesting all the protesting!
About to pick up these oysters. @Jstegman1 @Matt Ellerbee
I won’t be in town tomorrow and they closed sat. Big cooler with ice. No different than what the fish houses doBro, it's Wednesday....
I'm just in the mood to argue
Argue with meI'm just in the mood to argue
Is that a quote from The Life of Brian?I’m protesting all the protesting!
No I don't want toArgue with me
But as a Judeo-Christian society that has theologically driven morals and values, the argument is necessarily intertwined. Theology can't be viewed in a vacuum.Sure, again biblically speaking men are to be the leaders of the household and protectors. I’m not arguing women can’t hold some of the same positions men can. I am however arguing it goes against the creative order and isn’t beneficial to society.
from a secular perspective, of course egalitarianism makes sense.
I never said women are to only be housewives, in the Old Testament there were a few women judges, queen Esther, etc etc, Mary (a woman) was the first to Jesus’s Tomb and told the disciples( who were all male) about his resurrection. I’m not and would never argue men have more inherent value, men and women are both equal in value and dignity but distinct in role. Historically men are disposable and women are treated as the more valuable gender because they reproduce and keep the family going. Which is what I would argue for. Again, if you don’t believe in the Bible, this argument doesn’t jive with people because the standard is Thoelogical not societal.
Haven't made it through my coffee yet.Damn yall are all uppity in here this am