Buffer Tube Buttstock
- Thread starter rOmiLaYu
- Start date
Which is why my beef was with the pic of the firearm shown, not the stock.Also not a NFA only item.
Yes, if you put it on your standard Glock 17 you have created a short barrel rifle and you better have a stamp for it. However, if you put it on your Glock 17 that you put a 16" barrel into, it is not a NFA item and doesn't require any paperwork.
A butt stock is never what makes an item illegal. It is the short barrel in all of these cases. Once you put a butt stock on a gun it is designed to be fired from the shoulder and is by default a rifle. At that point the only thing that matters in the legal eye is the length of the barrel.
My point was simply that a buttstock can never be NFA only and a butt stock cannot make a NFA item. There are no NFA laws regarding butt stocks.
and my point is even if it was clearly a SBR, nothing there suggest is is legal to install on an SBR sans stamp. That is your own binary thinking assuming that a rifle isn't a legally registered NFA item. When I see an NFA item I automatically assume it is legal.
I was simply trying to see it through the eyes of the average consumer. I think your binary thinking (your point of view vs. mine) was clouding your judgement.
Average consumer is a dumbass. Nothing will or can change that.
I don't know man, nothing anywhere on that page even remotely resembles an AR pistol to me, even if you ignore the fact it is a buttstock.
I guess that is just because I am smarter than you though. That's my cross to bear I suppose.
That is not the manufacturers problem. Where you see a misleading picture, I see a shot taken at an angle that showcases the product instead of the rifle it's attached to. BAD has never marketed that butt stock as a brace or anything other than a lightweight butt stock. It's is the customers responsibility to understand the law. BAD has never implied that it was intended for use on a pistol, because it wasn't designed for pistols.