No, they haven't changed their minds there was just a lot of confusion about the previous letter.Can't watch it now, but am I to understand that, once again, they have changed their minds?
How the hell is a lawful gun owner supposed to keep up with this?
No, they haven't changed their minds there was just a lot of confusion about the previous letter.
I think it was only one person, and charges were never filed at the Atfs recommendation.Guess they'll have to drop all the charges on the people arrested so far lol. This was never the big issue it was made out to be. I would have loved to see them try and argue to a judge that a perfectly legal assemble pistol automatically becomes a rifle when it touches your shoulder
It was sent to SB Tactical, and applies to their product (since they sent the inquiry) and others like theirs...but not the rigid brace's sans arm strap like the shockwave. It's simply a clarification of the previous letter, not a new pronouncement.Found the actual letter, not the SB Tactical press release.
https://m.box.com/shared_item/https://app.box.com/s/bednscsqudabbd1sparpxzi8nket0ruw
Please note, nowhere in the letter does it specifically mention the SBT product. It addresses braces in general.
I shouldered a Draco with a brace right in front of an ATF field agent doing the yearly inspection at the Pawn shop I was working at last year.
Me: Hey are you going to arrest me?
ATF: For What?
Me: Shouldering this Sig Brace.
ATF: Huh? Ain't that how your supposed to hold it?
Me: No this is a pistol.
ATF: That's a pistol?