Im.not either...but by your comments I see that you are. If you can convince me why anyone should buy a G17 over a VP9 when they are within $50 of each other I'd concede...The VP9 is truly ambi and has adjustable back straps AND side panels...it's just a better gum for what the military needs. Though unless they actually tell NATO and the Geneva Conventions to eat a dick amd use HP ammo I would imagine they will go with a .45. Bigger holes bleed more.
I'd also bet a hammer fired Glock would cost about $750-850...maybe more.
Probably so.
I am a big fan of the 45 cartridge.
I bet they will go with .40 though. About the same ammo capacity as the 9mm.
A G17 is not my fav. I like the 19 and the 21.
I am not a fan of all Glocks. I hate the baby ones, and I can't stand the 23. But to each his own. The G19 is the best pistol I have ever held. It just suits me perfectly.
But that's the way pistols are. They are a very individual choice. Good thing we have so many choices.
I would bet the govt. will figure out something to cock this all up though. I don't think anyone saw the Beretta replacing the 1911. That one came completely out of left field.
I think the most plausible explanation for the Beretta choice was that Reagan wanted missile bases in Italy about that time. Word was that the govt wanted the pistol contract. They got the pistol and Reagan got his missile bases.
This choice will probably be based on whichever gun Jay-Z thinks is mo gangsta-given the current state of affairs.