9mm AR's - UZI vs. Glock Mags vs. Colt
- Thread starter Laufen
- Start date
It's that slant angle, it's just weird and unnatural.
I just wish someone could figure out how to get an AR to feed from MP5 mags. Dual feed position mags are much metter IMO
I'm fine going either route. PSA has some good deals on Colt mag fed lowers right now. Still looking for an upper.
I saw that too does the Colt mag fed have the last round bolt open or is there machining involved and are the PSA Colt lowers compatible with different upper makes.
I'm with @Strider12 on this one. The Glock mag angle in an ar looks ridiculous. I went Colt for aesthetics and because I just like the idea of having metal mags. And I hate Glocks.
Plus with Glock mags you can't stand it up like this for photo ops. Isn't that right @Leshaire ?
Plus with Glock mags you can't stand it up like this for photo ops. Isn't that right @Leshaire ?
I personally don't have a issue with the glock mags. But to each their own.
@Willy Leadwell it ain't all about the poses homie
@Willy Leadwell it ain't all about the poses homie
You can't operate with those plastic mags in that plastic gun.
I beg to differ. It's all about posing operationally.
The mags may be plastic but they will still preform.
If I want to pose operationally I will ask to borrow your tactical thong.
The don't make a mag block for Glock mags and I'm not about to SBR a 9mm dedicated lower so Colt/modified UZI mags for me.
I'll send it home with your old lady.
For real though, if I had Glocks I would have built my SBR with a Glock mag lower. It would be kinda dumb not to.
Last edited:
That's 1 SBR you won't regret. It looks badd ass with a can not to mention how much accuracy you get back with it
I agree. I just hope someone comes out with a decent trigger for the thing. 11-13 pounds isn't cutting the mustard.