So, if ammo cost were NOT an issue, is 300 BO or 5.56 a better choice for a primary defensive rifle?
Yeah, I'd take x39 over both too. We agreed, mark it down and erect a monument.7.62x39. Sorry. I had to. IV8888 did a good video on 7.62x39 vs 300 bo. Anyhoo....at close quarters I'd rather have more lead. I would take the 300. I only have one 5.56 and it's my pistol.
Yeah, I'd take x39 over both too. We agreed, mark it down and erect a monument.
7.62x39. Sorry. I had to. IV8888 did a good video on 7.62x39 vs 300 bo. Anyhoo....at close quarters I'd rather have more lead. I would take the 300. I only have one 5.56 and it's my pistol.
Umm what?
Is an AR pistol not for close quarters? Looks like you already chose 5.56 and not 300BO or 7.62x39.
I wanted to build a cheap one. 400 bucks with delta team tactical. A 7.62x39 would have cost me more. It's my toy. I like it when my ears are ringing and fire shits out the barrel. If shit went down here I would grab my 7.62. That you can count on.
Should we schedule the erection now or are you guys just gonna wing it??Yeah, I'd take x39 over both too. We agreed, mark it down and erect a monument.
I'm pretty spontaneous.Should we schedule the erection now or are you guys just gonna wing it??
Hopefully he realized he needs to build a 7.62x39 and went to buy parts.So what happened to op? Ask a question then watch the idiots? Cant trust that guy.
Nah...x39 isn't really an option because
1. I cant shoot steel case at the range, and if I'm spending money for brass then 300 BO is cheaper (I realise I said $$ isnt a concern, but that was to weed out the "300 BO is sooo expensive ")
B. I like not having to worry about finding and buying special mags, or using AK mags as the AR mag insertion is what I want.