Search results

@Hoss @AirOpsMgr can you both please remove and ban NWS for violating my thread rules

better?

@Laufen don't post in this thread, just a reminder

I bet HITLERY would like neither

Sure would look like on my all wood FUDDmaster 4000.

did you even read the title, I see your an asshole on any website your on. escpially on Ilikeguys.com

something something, I am having sex with either you or your mother

buy both from @DoglegArms!

The osprey seems like it was designed just to look cool, is it actually any shorter?

PLEASE stay on topic

Your BLOCK look like an austrian shit it, the 1911 is nice though

Personally, I like both, but you should really go with the octane for the durability.

Having to not resubmit the photos and prints makes it feasible to still use a trust and continue to buy cans without it being a huge bitch, plus you'll have an excuse to buy a can at least once every two years

An overlooked bit so far by many people is on Pages 242-243. "§ 479.63 Identification of applicant. -> (iv) ->(c) If the applicant entity has had an application approved as a maker or transferee within the preceding 24 months, and there has been no change to the documentation previously...

Yea I Keep hearing about grandfathering too.

there is not CLEO signoff anymore, but photos and fingerprints like a bunch of child molesters.

I just hope the silencer industry survives this

Technically speaking your fine with a standard mil spec tube, but then there are possible issues of constructive intent. Anything other than an explicitly designed pistol buffer is just you trying to prove that you don't intend to create a short barre rifle

Every threeper group I see is virulently anti Muslim.