I agree with this! The only reason for SBR's and SBS's is the fact that they are supposedly easier to conceal, thus more likely to be used in a crime. Handguns are concealed easily and can be legally carried so with a permit. Why not SB'd firearms. Suppressors really will not hide a crime as most criminals would not use them if they are concealing their weapon!
Yes, absolutely. There is no reason beside the tax money and just plain control to have these as NFA items.
Meh, if it was about the money, I seriously doubt it would have stayed at $200 for the past 81 years; it's all about "control"
But I guess we should look on the bright side, at least it doesn't cost us $12,000 to own a suppressor or SBR
Give it until the next election and I bet we'll be paying for a $200 stamp to purchase a 30rnd mag or reload our own ammo
If the wrong side wins, we all lose big time.Give it until the next election and I bet we'll be paying for a $200 stamp to purchase a 30rnd mag or reload our own ammo
Well this is why you join the NRA and keep up with what's going on, write reps and so on. AND I might add, why you go to the same effort for things that don't personally concern you.Give it until the next election and I bet we'll be paying for a $200 stamp to purchase a 30rnd mag or reload our own ammo
